Social Art and Social Artist

On the panel of “Digital Community” Winners talk I moderated two days ago in Linz,  the three speakers, including Iris Wu from 1kg.org, David Sasaki from GlobalVoicesOnline.org and Jeana Frost from PatientsLikeMe.com, all present the beautifulness of their web site and communities. So I call those rewarding winning sites “Social Art“, and of course the people behind them are Social Artists.

image

So what really Social Art is? Let’s try to define it.  Social Art is very dynamic creation by crowds with 6 degree of separations. Someone with creative ideas can start from a small core by building framework to foster a community(for sure nobody there the first minute).  However, the core framework can grow organically  with open DNA and consistence on  Sharism philosophy.   The beautifulness, of course, is the big picture of so many mirco-behaviors vibrate in such community. So it can be seen as dynamic social artwork. Just like the big  cluster of the clouds from the window of flight, Social Art is always changing to attract everyone of us to fly into it, or zooming in and out of it.

Then we need more social artists to create such core frameworks. Lets hope the rains of social creativities.

Why Godaddy.com was blocked by China without tears?

// updates: Some twitter users reported Godaddy.com can be accessed again in China from last night on. It’s not surprising thinking of Sourceforge and Wikipedia‘s sufferings back and forth.

Domain registrar Godaddy.com was blocked in China about one week ago just after the closing of Olympic Games.  Same as usual, there’s no any official explanation from authority on this blockage. Some bloggers like William Long in China guessed that it’s because Godaddy provided a way for people to bypass CNNIC(The root institution managing .cn domains) to prevent people from registering domain names featuring the names of Chinese gold medallists.

screenshot of Godaddy.com tracert result

Isn’t it funny? But the  most ironical thing is that Godaddy ever cooperated with China authority last year to suspend some human rights sites without warning last year to please China government.  This time, not surprisingly, the rope hang itself.

When I read recent comments from Google CEO Eric Schmidt at “The Big Tent” event in Denver, I realized why these two G- are wrong:

Schmidt noted that the Chinese have a “Great Firewall” for censoring internet work and is so secretive that it’s illegal to describe it. “A rough summary is that if you don’t say Falun Gong,” it’s okay. The question, said Schmidt, is whether the Chinese are better off with Google than without.— via  Portfolio.com

Either blind about Google China’s operation or doesn’t telling the truth, Eric misled the audience that Google can do nothing in China but compromise.  However, the truth is Google China made more self-censorship rather than just complying the local laws. Google China management wanted to satisfy authority to exchange some space for surviving. But they are wrong as Godaddy, the government won’t buy in because there’s never contract or agreement to protect them.  The hidden rules in China will change all the time. Just like Godaddy’s case, any cases can become your nightmare whether it’s an event, a people’s name, or a domain name. And the worst thing you can never recover is that you lost the support from users.  There’s only one government one business can please today or tomorrow, but there are millions of users one can’t be fooled.

Last year, in my open letter to Google Founders, “The more compromise, the worse”.  I explained in some other occasions why Google lost market share time by time even they self-censor themselves a lot in this country.  The China team not only did a very bad job losing all frontiers to their competitors in this fastest and biggest Internet soil, but also lost trust and loyalty from their existing users.  With the same effort and resource to make self-censorship(they put more and more people on filtering system), they can fight back with their guns(technology, laws, user supports, etc.). They didn’t complete any missions without accountability.

Once in a private talk with one senior officials of Google China, he was surprised when I told him the story China netizen helped Google back in 2002 when it’s blocked in China the first time. Since they’ve forgotten it (are they googlers?), they won’t care users too much today.  However, Big Brother can never be satisfied, even one single day.  Godaddy.com proved this thumb rule. Godaddy.com was blocked in China. Surely it’s so bad to their business benefit from Chinese users. But some Chinese users said, “It deserved! No tears”.

Fresh Old Artcicle on Guardian

One of my old articles wrote for Guardian has just been published online after it’s accomplishment about half year ago. Thanks to my diligent editor Leslie Plommer for the perfect collaboration months ago and eventually make the article published from hibernation. Now I need people’s comments.

It’s a fresh old article. If I re-write the story today, I would love to get more stories included happened recently especially this half. Shi Zhao, also my blogger friend and lead Wikipedian in China, told me the photos seem not so nice but too cynical. Ok, I will try to suggest editors next time. :)

Isaac Mao
Photograph: Martin Godwin/Guardian

Global Voices Summit 2008 in Budapest

Some links to this summit(#gvsummit08)  I’m attending from 25th-29th

http://summit08.globalvoicesonline.org/

Live stream: http://www.mayvelous.com/?p=402

Twitter channel: https://twitter.com/gvsummit08

Twitter summize: http://summize.com/search?q=gvsummit08

Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/event/global-voices-2008-summit

Photos on flickr: http://flickr.com/photos/tags/gvsummit08

Global Inter-media Dialogue 3

image  I’m now in Bali Island but not for the legend sea shore and historical views.  It’s the first time that I’m here joining the 3rd Global Inter-media Dialogue(GIMD), a conference backing by two distinction countries, Norway and Indonesia.  Deputy Minister Wegard Harsvik shared me the story how this GIMD was founded three years ago: Indonesia was one of three countries(China, Indonesia and Vietnam) Norway conducted talks on human rights with.  And eventually after those talks, Indonesia become more democratic and healthy on politics today.  They win the friendship of Norway as well. So the two governments set up the conference quickly in month in 2006.

I enjoyed some of the sessions especially those about local issues and community practices, but more happily to see old friends( Ying Chan, Kavi Chongkittavorn, etc.) there. I was surprised with the coverage of this conference because the organizers did invite a broad range of journalists from almost around the world. Amazingly, Cuban journalist, Lic. Magda Resik Aguirre,  almost flied around world to attend this conference.  The first session I joined was about the minority coverage problem of current media where a guy called Said Ibrahimi came from Afghanistan added me more knowledge about this country on the situations of reporters, as well the problems in that not-far-away country.  What should global journalists do with such issues? Be more participatory or be more professional watcher? How to keep ethics in extreme situations?

If we just think about such issues in traditional ways. I can’t help because they are actually the all time issues bothering journalism the whole discipline. The common problem to journalism in any countries, of course, its prejudice and ethical correctness. In our session called “Global Happenings” most on China issue, I quickly shared the future journalism could be the best collaborative spectrum between amateur journalism and professional journalism by applying the new technologies especially those web 2.0 ones.  The stories in China were actually telling not only the possibility of such blurring between amateur and professional journalism, but also the possibility to approach truth.

About the truth, actually it’ll be forever issue in our society but a real challenge to current traditional media. Even we can see some stories from the mainstream media covering minorities timely, it may be easily eclipsed by the limited bandwidth and persistency of the media. However, since everyone of us has more channels today to get information, you can sense how important the future journalism will be with new media technologies. Further saying, if people can provide and well use the throughput of new information channels, they can find more supporting materials to support their co-perceiving the truth.  Obviously, the traditional media and journalists should change themselves proactively to fit for the trend.

socialmediaFABRIC The last minute before I click “publish” of this post and go to the Bali beach, there’s a new notification from Twitter telling me one of my friends Maria Trombly  recommended a new article about journalism: The future of journalism. Though there are different perceptions on the future of journalism, the holy thing to me in Sharism age is that you can meet magic of coincidence with new technologies all the time. Isn’t it part of future journalism?

Sharism Slide

Just re-posted to Slideshare, yet to have another video explanation on BigThink.com.

Some pages on Slideshare were changed on color palettes and drawings positions. But seems slideshare is still the best place to share presentations.